More by: 1 A very powerful general-purpose word processor. PolyEdit is both a word processor and a plain text editor, that is designed to provide the power and functionality to satisfy the most demanding word processing requirements. PolyEdit supports multiple. Size: 1.3 MB, Price: USD $27.95, License: Shareware, Author: PolySoft Solutions (cryptedit.chat.ru) 2 EditPad Pro is a powerful and versatile text editor or word processor, designed to make text editing as convenient as possible. Write and edit all your text files such as source code, scripts, web sites, logs, letters, memos, reports, articles, etc. Size: 12.0 MB, Price: USD $49.95, EUR 39.95, License: Shareware, Author: Just Great Software (just-great-software.com) 3 Open source and 100% free office suite allowing you to create and edit documents, presentations, and spreadsheets stored on your PC or Mac without an Internet connection and easily switch to the online mode to collaborate on documents with co-workers.

Dj apps free. Djay Pro for Windows combines the best of both worlds, desktop and touch. Djay Pro gives you professional multi-channel output options. DJ Apps djay Pro for Mac djay Pro for Windows djay Pro for iPad djay Pro for iPhone djay 2 for iPad djay 2 for iPhone djay 2 for Android djay for Apple Watch. At the heart djay Pro is an innovative DJ Software with a modern user interface that provides flexible layers of functionality alongside a powerful music library into a single window interface. DJ Mixer Professional for Mac is the leading-edge and versatile DJ/VJ software that allowing you to create complex music and video mixes on the fly. This version featuring four DJ decks with. “DJ-1800 is a complete, self-contained professional DJ system for the Mac. All you need is a Mac, some amplification, and some music!” Features include pitch adjust, jog wheel, BPM calculation, integrated four channel mixer, and iTunes integration. Although we can’t promise to turn you into Grandmaster Flash overnight, we can show you the absolute best DJ software for Mac in 2018 to set you on your way. The good news is that when it comes to DJ software, Mac users have not been ignored by software developers.

Size: 184.0 MB, Price: Free, License: Freeware, Author: Ascensio System SIA (onlyoffice.com) 4 PIM and Word Processor with Tree Structure, Password protection. Txt,htm,rtf,wri TreeDBNotes is a free powerful and easy-to-use personal database program, PIM and Word Processor with Tree Structure, advanced encryption and password protection. Size: 1.7 MB, Price: Free, License: Freeware, Author: SoftViewer (mytreedb.com), 5 Atlantis Word Processor is powerful, fast-loading and fully customizable. Carefully designed with the end-user in mind, it will be the perfect companion for your word processing tasks.

Atlantis Word Processor is powerful, fast-loading and efficient. Size: 2.8 MB, Price: USD $35.00, License: Shareware, Author: The Atlantis Word Processor Team (AtlantisWordProcessor.com), 6 All in one! Versatile tree-structured Personal Information Manager, database, search engine, word processor, Website generator and more.

Store all your notes, letters, emails, texts, hyperlinks and keep them organized, always just a few clicks away. Size: 1.8 MB, Price: USD $29.95, License: Shareware, Author: Freebyte.com (freebyte.com), 7 Multi-featured Personal Information Manager with encryption, search engine, word processor, spell check, recycler, Website generator and much more! Store all your notes, etc. And keep them safe, encrypted, organized and always just a few clicks away.

Size: 2.8 MB, Price: USD $44.95, License: Shareware, Author: Freebyte.com (freebyte.com), 8 Rich text word processor with spell check, thesaurus, definitions, formatting ExactWord (formerly YTSEditor) is a full featured rich text word processor and text editor designed to give you exactly what you need. Rich Text Formatting gives you all the. Size: 11 B, Price: USD $24.95, License: Shareware, Author: Alcoda Software (alcodasoftware.com), 9 Words Utility, spell check, thesaurus, definitions, text editor, word processor Write Source is a highly configurable and centralized (entire suite available from Tray Icon & SmartBar) word utility spell check, thesaurus, dictionary, text editor utility.

Size: 14 B, Price: USD $45.95, License: Shareware, Author: Alcoda Software (alcodasoftware.com), 10 TreeDBNotes Pro is a powerful and easy-to-use personal database program, PIM, Word Processor,Alarm & Reminders, e-Book maker, Contacts and Passwords manager with Tree Structure, advanced encryption and password protection insert htm tables.Multilang. Size: 6.9 MB, Price: USD $34.00, License: Shareware, Author: SoftViewer (mytreedb.com), 11 Edit PDFs like a word processor. Easy to use PDF Editor. Edit PDFs like a word processor.

Easily edit the text in your PDFs, reflow and re-justify text, change fonts, colours and sizes. Resize, reposition and change images as you would in a professional.

Size: 8.8 MB, Price: USD $99.00, License: Demo, Author: Iceni Technology Ltd. (iceni.com), 12 A word processor, including spell checker. Topics and icons making it easy to use.

An information manager (or PIM) a database of your information. Ideaspad helps you to organize / manage your notes, information, documents, as easy to use as card file. Size: 3.2 MB, Price: USD $50.68, License: Shareware, Author: Mindwarp Consultancy Ltd (mcls4u.com), 13 If you want your word processor (a) to provide all the features of a modern high-end word processor, (b) to seamlessly read and write Microsoft Word documents, and (c) to be available on multiple platforms, look no further: TextMaker is here!

Size: 18.0 MB, Price: USD $49.95, License: Demo, Author: SoftMaker Software GmbH (officeviewers.com), 14 Editor is a Word Processor Control for desktop and web based applications that support WinXP styling, importing & exporting HTML, DOC & RTF file format, Paragraph and Character styles, Open, edit & save WordML documents using round tripping. Size: 11.1 MB, Price: USD $299.00, License: Shareware, Author: Aspose Pty Ltd (aspose.com), 15 PageFour is a word processing package designed for writers.

Its unique feature set combines a fully featured word processor with a powerful outliner and editing tool - ideal for structuring your novel, blog, journal, or diary. PageFour is a word processing.

Size: 4.4 MB, Price: USD $29.95, License: Shareware, Author: Page4 Software (softwareforwriting.com), 16 PolyEdit Lite is a free word processor that is designed to be lightweight, reliable, easy-to-use and extremely fast. All the expected functions are featured.

Best Mac Text Editor

PolyEdit Lite is a free word processor that lets you handle a wide variety of word processing. Size: 2.5 MB, Price: Free, License: Freeware, Author: PolySoft Solutions (cryptedit.chat.ru), 17 iStonsoft PDF to Word Converter for Mac is specially designed for Mac users to convert PDF to Word. PDF to Word Converter for Mac is the easiest and quickest solution to convert any Adobe PDF files to well-formatted Microsoft Word documents on Mac. Size: 5.9 MB, Price: USD $39.95, License: Shareware, Author: iStonsoft Studio (istonsoft.com), 18 Bean is a small, easy-to-use word processor (or more precisely, a rich text editor), designed to make writing convenient, efficient and comfortable. Bean is a small, easy-to-use word processor (or more precisely, a rich text editor), designed to make. Size: 3.7 MB, Price: Free, License: Freeware, Author: James Hoover (bean-osx.com), 19 The FocusWriter application was designed to be a fullscreen, distraction-free word processor designed to immerse you as much as possible in your work. The FocusWriter application was designed to be a fullscreen, distraction-free word processor designed.

Text Editor For Mac Os

Size: 9.0 MB, Price: Free, License: Freeware, Author: Graeme Gott (gottcode.org), 20 The FocusWriter application was designed to be a fullscreen, distraction-free word processor designed to immerse you as much as possible in your work. The FocusWriter application was designed to be a fullscreen, distraction-free word processor designed. Size: 9.0 MB, Price: Free, License: Freeware, Author: Graeme Gott (gottcode.org), 21 Atlantis is an interesting, no-nonsense word processor application created with the end-user in mind. Atlantis is an interesting, no-nonsense word processor application created with the end-user in mind. Compact, fast-loading, but still powerful.

Size: 3.3 MB, Price: USD $35.00, License: Trialware, Author: Rising Sun Solutions, Inc. (AtlantisWordProcessor.com), 22 Jarte is a free, small, portable word processor based on the Microsoft WordPad word processing engine built into Windows. Jarte is a free, small, portable word processor based on the Microsoft WordPad word processing engine built into Windows. Size: 3.8 MB, Price: Free, License: Freeware, Author: Carolina Road Software L.L.C.

Pure Mac: Word Processing Text Editors For Windows

(jarte.com), 23 Element WordPro is a low cost, feature rich word processor with superior PDF, DOC and DOCX support. Element WordPro is a low cost, feature rich word processor with superior PDF, DOC and DOCX support. Element WordPro gives you more power. Size: 17.3 MB, Price: USD $15.51, License: Trialware, Author: Element Software (elementsoftwareapps.com), 24 DevVicky Word is a stable, feature-savvy word processor unbound by a proprietary file formats.

DevVicky Word is a stable, feature-savvy word processor unbound by a proprietary file formats. Besides handling an equally impressive number of file formats. Size: 7.1 MB, Price: Free, License: Freeware, Author: DevVicky Ltd. (DevVicky.com), 25 Yeah Write, the easy to use fill-in-the-blank word processor for the computer illiterate or for those business professionals that want to create a document quickly and easily, without having to worry about formatting. Yeah Write, the easy to use fill-in-the-blank. Size: 1.0 MB, Price: USD $19.00, License: Free to try, Author: Word Place (wordplace.com),.

GIVEAWAY: Will is generously giving away a Kindle copy of his latest ebook, to the person who leaves his favourite comment. Bonus points if you make him laugh! Comment within one week to enter. (Update: Martina won!) Many writers struggle with MSW addiction. They tell themselves they’re not addicted. They tell themselves they need MSW.

They tell themselves they can quit whenever they want. But they can’t. No matter how much they hate it, no matter how much they wish they could stop, no matter how much it affects their professional and personal lives, they keep using MSW. I, for one, will no longer enable the use of Microsoft Word.

I know all the excuses. “I’ve been using it forever.” “I have to use it. It‘s the only way to get my work done.” “I just need it for one more project.

After that, I quit.” Does any of these excuses sound familiar? Well, I’m here to tell you there’s a way out. No more fighting with frustrating and convoluted menu systems.

No more deciphering mysterious formatting and layout quirks. No more emailing Word files to your friends and colleagues with your fingers crossed, hoping your document appears correctly. Word processing beyond Word To start, you might try another, better word processor. Apple’s and are the heavy hitters and is a long-time writer favorite. There are also new entrants, such as, who hope to modernize word processing.

Each of these programs is superior to Word, but you can go even further. Be bold: quit word processing altogether. Or at the very least, quit using word processors for composition. You see, word processors, especially ones like Microsoft Word, aren’t actually good tools for composition. The act of composing is about ordering and structuring thoughts. It’s not about setting your margins or choosing fonts or italicizing phrases.

But word processors are notoriously bad at letting you just compose. Word processors conflate composition with typesetting. Making stylistic decisions about your work is a separate mental process from penning your thoughts. When writing software forces you to deal with presentational elements, it only distracts from composition. Even if you try to ignore the stylistic decisions, Word will be typesetting your text anyway. And you’re still stuck looking at a bloated interface built for formatting, not composing.

So during your composition process, skip the apps that want you to make stylistic decisions. Instead, use a plain text editor. Editing in plain text Plain text editors let you compose in plain, unformatted text. Notepad for Windows and TextEdit for Mac OS X are the standards, but they’re nothing compared to more robust editors. There are fantastic plain text apps that provide a heavenly writing environment, especially compared to the hell of Microsoft Word.

Here are a few options to get you started:. and are beloved by Mac users. They also have iOS counterparts, so you can use them on your iPhone and iPad. and are Windows-only options. They’ve been around for years and have been battle-tested by many a writer.

and are both cross-platform editors, meaning they work on both PCs and Macs. If you use multiple machines with different operating systems, these programs are a great way to maintain a similar writing environment on each device. If you’re committed to writing on your smartphone, Brett Terpstra’s will blow your mind.

There are dozens of options to fit your every need. Android users, try. Kelly Gurnett suggests even more writing tools in her post.

Try composing in several different programs to help you get a feel for which one you prefer. I guarantee they’ll all be a more pleasant experience than your word processor. And if you absolutely have to, you can always turn to a word processor later in your workflow, when you need to format or print a document. (Although, I suspect that if most of your writing is intended for the web, you’ll have little use for it at all.) Remember, friends don’t let friends use Microsoft Word. (Like this idea? ) How do you feel about Microsoft Word? Do you have a favorite program for composition?

Don’t forget to comment so you’re in the running for Will’s ebook giveaway! You could win a free Kindle copy of his latest ebook,. (Update: Martina won!). I’m attaining my dream. Currently I am finishing my BA in English and writing a novel.

For decades I put off doing what I wanted to do and focused on what I had to do. It is my turn now, and I have polished off those archaic ideas and thoughts and expanded my universe in every way but one. For my research papers I must use APA or MLA and of course Riverpoint Writer is excellent for those. I hate Word for my writing. When I write I do not always write in a straight line. An idea may hit me that needs to be in a totally different chapter from the one I’m writing and then I’m working through page breaks, scrolling through chapters, etc.

I have not tried any of the ones you suggested but I’m on my way now to see which one will work best for me. I want out of my rut, out of the mire that is MSW, and into the life I desire – a published accomplished author with much to my credit. First item on the agenda: create a blog.

Next item: determine a subject – this has me stuck like molasses in January. After 67 years on this planet you’d think I could pick a subject but nothing has hit and stuck!

Hobbies over the years? So many directions. Horseback riding for seniors? Where do I turn and what do I say? First, though, is this new software! Thank you for showing me the way! I thing you can try that may help you with organizing your manuscripts, if you haven’t done so already, is to learn how to use the Headings styles in MS Word to break up your manuscript into manageable chunks.

You can define chapters and scenes using the Headings and then easily navigate around your manuscript using the Navigation Pane. I find that it definitely helps with a more nonlinear style of writing. I tried using Scrivener and I did like a lot of its features, but I didn’t like how I had to still export my manuscript in smaller chunks and then recompile them together in Word for submission and formatting. I also didn’t like how a Scrivener manuscript is associated with its own project folder, which made it difficult to keep track of different projects when using the cloud to work on a manuscript across multiple computers.

So I did some research and by learning how to use the Heading styles and Navigation pane I was able to reproduce in Word some of the features in Scrivener that I liked. I’ve had some contact with people in the publishing world, and like it or not, it seems that for the foreseeable future MS Word will continue to be the word processing standard in the publishing industry because apparently it is the only word processor that has all the comprehensive editing and typographical features that editors need to work with manuscripts, or so I’ve been told. Claus, from your comment here, I think it safe to assume you are not an entrepreneur. Had you ever attempted to market a product or service, you would not hold a notion like this. One could paste over the words “Microsoft programs” in your post any of hundreds of powerful product names marketed in the early IBM era that no longer exist today. SuerCalc, a spreadsheet program, ran on Apple and all PCs running DOS, including IBM.

It was the “standard” and may have been the first computer program considered “a standard.” In spite of all that power, Microsoft Excel buried it in the early 90s. Way back when I purchased my first copy of Microsoft Word, I had spent days trying to choose between Word, WordStar, and WordPerfect. At that time, WordPerfect was the standard word processor, and many of my friends thought me crazy for choosing the upstart Word. As long as the marketplace is open and free, people will spend time examining options prior to making a final choice. Moreover, given that kind of market ethos, there will be nearly infinite choice.

The vast majority needing a word processor have chosen Microsoft Word. I believe that free people free to choose make good choices. Stephen, you can talk standard until you are blue in the face, but in my opinion Microsoft is at least a decade behind the competition in all phases of computing. One might even say that they have been resting on their laurels for so long that whatever creativity they brought into computers is long gone.

Questionably they are, of course, known for their operating systems, but will they ever come up with one that needs not to be tweaked almost continuously until it is abandoned only to be replaced by another that is buggier than a New Jersey swamp in June. It is my devout wish that someone would dethrone the overweight monster that is Microsoft. As someone who has written engineering standards for everything from surgical supplies to airfield marking and lighting and visual landing aids, I find it interesting that the “standardization agency” known as Microsoft has not been able to garner an even larger corner of the market. In my opinion I prefer WordPerfect as a Wysiwyg word processor over anything else on the market. Every time I have been forced to use Miicrosoft for writing I have felt imposed upon. Generally speaking, I prefer my old Underwood to anything Microsoft has to offer.

Here is how Microsoft programs became the standard. Because DOS was far and away the best operating system for the money (note that qualification), Microsoft had infinite resources to spend on developing new programs. It follows then, that those new programs were so superior to the choices available, the majority of buyers chose them over other options. Add to this the fact that Bill Gates is considered by business historians as the greatest business manager ever in the history of the greatest country ever, and the conclusion is a no-brainer. Microsoft became the industry standard because Bill Gates was smart enough to install DOS (as was) on every office machine he sold for “free”.

At the time, most computers were sold without an operating system. By “giving away” the operating system, Bill realised that people would look for software programs which actually worked on it. That is where he made his money. Pretty soon, in the business world, Microsoft was king because they were one of the first out of the block with integrated word processor, spreadsheet, database and presentation software. The rest was down to the fact that businesses crave stability and standards and that they have to share documents between departments and also with their customers, suppliers, government departments and so on.

Guess who very quickly got into government departments and pitched his wares.? Murphy, Please don’t take this as rude, but what you are saying here is not correct.

MS-DOS originated as only one of the several operating systems offered by IBM in 1981 when they started marketing what came to be called the PC. The majority buying an IBM machine back then opted to add MS-DOS because it wasn’t free and it wasn’t expensive.

Gates was a marketing genius, and he priced MS-DOS perfectly for the IBM market. Keep this in mind. IBM pitched everybody remotely capable of producing an operating system for their machine. It was not pure luck that Gates got in on the deal. Microsoft became instantly profitable because the were hanging on IBM’s coat tail, the biggest tech company in the world. They succeeded because Gates was willing to produce what IBM wanted. Secondly, Gates never sold any “machine.” From 1981 to 1995, MS-DOS was licensed to over 70 companies producing computers.

Among them were all of the big producers like IBM, Gateway, Dell, Tandy, Commodore, and so forth. Apple, by comparison, was tiny. By the mid-80s, computer manufacturers stopped offering multiple possible operating systems and simply relied on DOS. Since 1995, Microsoft has over-whelmingly dominated the market for operating systems — a 35-year streak unmatched by any other company in marketing history.

Stephen, Thanks for the detailed history lesson. I must confess I was relying on a very old and unreliable “folk memory” when I made my post and did not go back to check the details of the story. No wonder defence lawyers can tear apart eye witnesses in Court with such ease! The key point, as you also acknowledge, is that Bill Gates was a very smart marketing man and thus his product became ubiquitous. In the same way that no-one was ever fired for buying IBM, so no-one ever lost their job buying Microsoft – certainly not in the corporate world.

That having been said, Microsoft has never been a generous company. Unlike others who embraced the open source model, Microsoft has always preferred to create closed, proprietary products in an attempt to lock in their customers. In the early days, that, too, was a key part of their success: sell everywhere at a reasonable price, lock in your customers and your customer’s customers and suppliers and then turn the ratchet. You’re forgetting a machine that was my first computer, and changed my writing in a major way. I bought my first Kaypro 2 in 1984, for writing TV scripts at home. And a second one for the office in 1985. (Each was bundled with a daisy-wheel printer.) It had two floppy drives, the top one for application floppy, the lower to save the work on.

The computer was called a “luggable”, bulky and heavy but one piece (the keyboard attached, keys inward, onto one end) and one could tote it with one hand. (Of course, you needed some strength to carry it.) It and it’s elegant (for the time) operating system CP/M were designed by the late, great Alan Kay (sp?) a gentlemen who took it in stride when a lot of his code “somehow” ended up in MS-DOS. A classy gent with a fine soul, a very solid machine who should not be forgotten.

Not yet anyway. I think Bill Gate’s genius was actually luck in the form of IBM’s shortsightedness. I was told they had an option to BUY MS-DOS outright from Gates/Microsoft and balked at the price. After which Gates proceeded to “license” it, for a fee, to EVERY computer sold that ran the system. So IBM remained a hardware company with slowly diminishing returns, Microsoft a software outfit that would for some time control most of the computing world. (That’s all– as far as I know– at least a 90%accurate recounting. I’m older now, memory no longer a steel trap.

Sometimes more like flypaper. Or scotch tape. Fortunate that you prefaced your remarks with “I think.” However, you should know that IBM’s carefully considered decision to stick with hardware led to “Deep Blue” (Look it up), which is the reason Warren Buffet became a major IBM stockholder. IBM went on to build new kinds of massively parallel computers such as IBM Blue Gene (Look it up). Blue Gene’s 131,000 parallel processors routinely handle 280 trillion operations every second. A single scientist with a calculator would have to work nonstop for 177,000 years to perform the operations that Blue Gene can do in one second. I suppose I don’t have to explain how this has benefited simple, poor families all over the world by providing universities, governments, and commercial research labs with technical ability to address a wide range of problems that had simply been too complex to tackle.

BTW, you may be interested to know, last year alone, IBM invested a mind-boggling $5 billion in new technologies. It is impossible to calculate the benefit this investment will ultimately bring to ordinary people like you and me. Used to train lawyer to use MS Office and I also used to be a typesetter. I really enjoy formatting as I type, and using keyboard shortcuts makes it fast and easy.

I write screenplays, among other things, and I need a program with styles that I can assign keyboard shortcuts to so I can change styles rapidly. When I quit doing software training, I got a Mac and switched to Pages, which is a great little program. Not as robust as Word, but I could do what I needed to with styles, so I was happy. Then they started changing things because they want an app that works with iOS and Mac’s OS and lets users go back and forth seamlessly. So they started getting rid of features I used. When upgrading feels like downgrading, that’s not good.

But even so, I don’t get Word. Too bad Word pushed WordPerfect out of the picture.

That was a great program. There’s also Open Office, which is an open source version of MS Word’s programs (and it’s FREE). I’ve used that some. Just haven’t used it enough to zoom around in it. Thinking about it though.

I worked with Scrivener for a while and found it difficult to master. It takes a lot of setting up. (I just want to start writing) Pieces are scattered and disjointed. There are enough writing shortcuts.

I didn’t like how you had to name each scene. It was very clunky and hard to read straight through. Very difficult to transfer a Word document (I have many WIPS) into Scrivener. I saw a few advantages over Word, but not enough to use it full time. I don’t write in chunks, like Scrivener. I write linearly, from beginning to end, not in pieces that require elaborate compilation later.

I love Autocorrect so I can type 2-3 letters and have expand to long names, words, phrases and places that I don’t have to write out every time. (Especially nice when I’ writing fantasy) With Word, I can save my doc at any time as a PDF, send it to my Kindle, and read the completed work (so it looks like a book) and use Kindle’s note feature for marking changes for editing. For me, Word works. I could write a third of a novel in the time it would take to learn Scrivener. Susan, I am like you.

I have tried Scrivener many times, and it never took. Part of the issue is that I honestly love Word. I’ve been writing in it for about 20 years, and at this point, I’m completely comfortable with it. I also use it to format my ebooks and print books, and find it perfectly able to do everything I want it to. I don’t have anything against other programs. Q10 is a great, lightweight program, and I used it installed on a netbook for several years.

It didn’t need as much memory as Word and it’s great for distraction free writing. But it also doesn’t allow ANY formatting, so if I want something in italics, I’m out of luck. That said, I kept having FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) feelings about Scrivener, so I have been using it for my NaNoWriMo project this month, and I’m finally starting to appreciate it. EXCEPT — and here’s something that is important to me — Scrivener’s file formats aren’t universal, so if I want to work on it on another machine without Scrivener installed, I have to remember to compile it as a Word document. This adds another layer of work, which is frustrating. So yeah, I’m a dyed-in-the-wool PC & Word user myself.

Nothing against other programs, but I get a little tired of people hating on tools that have worked beautifully for me for decades. Interesting post! In terms of composition, I think you’re absolutely right: Word sucks. I like Pages for blog drafts and OmmWriter for creative pieces. Unfortunately, the majority of my time isn’t spent composing. I’m an editor, and in my line of work, it’s all about what’s compatible with the programs my authors are using. Pages has its own Track Changes system, but most of my authors don’t have Pages, and I’m always paranoid some of my tracked changes will be lost when I convert the file to.docx.

Plus most of my authors are self-publishers, so they want to work within Word since it’s easier for them to format a final draft that will upload properly to online publishing services. For the time being, it looks like I’m stuck wrangling with the beast.